We are living in a high technology era that sometimes, it can be destroying for every person. These high speed gears, wittingly or unwittingly would affect our personal life. I agree with the statement and approve this weak bonding as well.
In past times, a majority of people have lived traditionally and family members were bigger than now. Our ancestors lived with their grand parents and their children used to be live with them. All family members help each other in works. Fathers and sons used to work outside and daughters and mothers contributed in house works. After marriage of sons, they also preferred to stay with their family members and by helping their father, they could cover their daily expenses. The only victorious key of family was being together and continuing their ancestors crafts. The bond between family members was very tight and the morality was the important issue for everyone.
By speeding up the technology growth and improving educational infrastructures every family and parents encourage their children to enter in a social community and earn experiences for they future life. For having better life, children leave their families and live far away in other countries and cities in order to make important decisions for their future. and we see that parents become depressed because of long distances and children as well. As far as I’m concerned, this distances, sometimes, strongly can make families bonds weaker and weaker. Another issue is about people’s life style. Todays, material gains are very important than morality. Having a house in bosh area, having luxurious cars, well decorated house or a corporate job with high remuneration become more important than our children’s upbringing and these are disasters.
All in all, there are families that their family bonding are more important than every material gains and they really try to keep their bonding strong as well as possible and don’t forget morality never.
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends They have just sent you some photos of your holiday Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter thank them for the photos and for the holiday explain why you didn t w 78
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter explain why you have moved describe the new house invite your friend to come and visit 11
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t times, a majority of people have lived traditionally and family members were bi...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...e important decisions for their future. and we see that parents become depressed be...
^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...possible and don't forget morality never.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25078369906 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61026710592 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557993730408 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0280476888 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0555555556 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129837930855 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450524848262 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347977347384 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822098940797 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374882256195 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.