The graph shows the amount of unemployment in a time of seven years period. The vertical axis provides information about percentage of work force and the horizontal axis is about the years.
At first, a short glimpse to lined curve, illustrate that by increasing the amount of work force, there is an increasing trend in unemployment rate of Japanese people. Of course, there are some marginal differences in some years because of the constant percentage of work force. But, by increasing the force the unemployment rates would increase.
The dotted curve relating to USA shows that, by increasing the percentage of work force the unemployment rates have increased as same as Japan. However, the amount of work force in USA is much greater than Japan and it can be said that the maximum work force in Japan is minimum work force in USA.
All in all, as figure shows, there is a revise relationship by increasing years from 1993 to 1999 between these two countries.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage of work force. But, by increasing the force the unemployment rates would i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90303030303 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71611184316 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0489693485 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120590855151 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625320654234 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394420908252 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764384950701 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108886256137 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.