It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A belief that making one talented in any particular field is possible despite the lack of inborn skills challenges the other view of people who believe people born with natural talents. This essay will discuss why learned talent is helpful but why an inborn talent is ultimately superior.
One can become good at sports or music by learning related skills but many think that it is arduous. Even though some people do not have innate skills, continuous practice, and development of interests to learn something new that triggers hard work will eventually pay off. For example, when I wanted to learn karate, I worked really hard to train myself. Rigorous training made me win most of the competitions I attended in spite of my inability at the beginning compared to other fellow participants who had it in their blood.
But not everyone will have the required capacity. Having the skills before birth itself will make one excel in the field one wants without much effort. While others spend time on initial practice, those naturally talented can use that time for developing extreme skills. For instance, I did no regular practice like my brother in school. When we playfully decided and raced as we both were the best athletes in our schools, I beat him because of my natural running skills.
With advancements in technology and sincere aspirants, inborn talents are being challenged somewhat equally today. This essay discussed why natural talents are more helpful than the latter view's advantages. In my opinion, innate talents offer people more chance to achieve greater levels of success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Esther Katlyn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | morbymuku | 92 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage. 90
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.USE SPECIFIC REASONS AND EXAMPLES TO SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER. 70
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 73
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mammal known as Repenornamus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob 54
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. W 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articipants who had it in their blood. But not everyone will have the required ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, really, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07196969697 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50666867692 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0047746946 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178853568269 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055636060827 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545863961114 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100077201253 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030969229332 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.