Children are the future of the world. How they live together as children decides what kind of world we should see in the future. I totally agree with the idea that kids from different social backgrounds and varied ability should get together well at school and I will elaborate on the reasons below.
Cogent reason for get students together is that social classes while, this is a sensitive part of society. School are not any exception. More specifically, it is common to see children from different social classes at school. This is because in educational institutions they might learn to respect everyone with regardless of the financial status of their family, and all of them will experience the notice of equality.
Moreover, mixing of children of different backgrounds enable them to gain a lot in different aspects especially knowledge. The reason for this is that different regions of the country, their culture and religion, traditional dresses, unique cuisines and the famous geographical landmarks. For example, they get the opportunity to learn native languages. Furthermore, once they become adults, they have a wide range of friends of different cultures all over the country.
Finally, living together children can create a competition in school is that it motivates children to do their best. For instance, youths will compare themselves to others and try to be better than them, and it prepare youths for competition in areas such as their future working lives.
In conclusion, I think that kids from different status should get together well at school because we can prevent from social classes issue. Also, students will gain more knowledge and competitive environment can have a more positive effect on children.
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 91
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- Many young people choose to take a year off between finishing school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel The experience of non academic life like this offers benefits the individual when they return to education To what e 86
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a varietyof social backgrounds mix with each other at school.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Children are the future of the world. Ho...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will elaborate on the reasons below. Cogent reason for get students together ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l experience the notice of equality. Moreover, mixing of children of differen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent cultures all over the country. Finally, living together children can cr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prepares'?
Suggestion: prepares
... and try to be better than them, and it prepare youths for competition in areas such as...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as their future working lives. In conclusion, I think that kids from di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24285714286 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75102021892 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6685713897 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211737170559 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732040457344 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652564516623 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120991960118 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563648088779 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.