It is a common belief that the decision of parents when choosing which school is appropriate for their children should depend on their circumstances, social background and their children’s special abilities. However, I firmly believe that making sure youngsters are be able to mix and get on well with each other at school ought to be the most crucial prerequisite.
To begin with, getting education at school consisting of many students from different social backgrounds can make children not stuck up and look down on their peers due to their poverty or disability. Any individuals at school are treated equally by their teacher without caring about their circumstances. They catch the same attention and get similar knowledge about subject, both of which can help them to ignore the differences and mix with each other.
On the other hand, there is no certainty that all students from wealthy families can study as well as those coming from poor ones. For instance, there has been many cases taking place in Vietnam about pupils with poverty reaching high scores in the university entrance exam because they make constant attempt ,spend many times on studying. This can absolutely proves that family conditions make no special things and learning in the environment having different kinds of culture not only not affect the education quality but also promote children to widen their knowledge from different culture or learn the way how to study effectively they don’t have from their classmates. Therefore, without excellent communication with friends, children will not have chances to enhance their knowledge and improve skills.
In conclusion, mixing with friends is downright important for children to have a good educational environment, and learning with friends with many kinds of social background can help children to experience many valuable aspects of life.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss and give an opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...believe that making sure youngsters are be able to mix and get on well with each o...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... exam because they make constant attempt ,spend many times on studying. This can a...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
... times on studying. This can absolutely proves that family conditions make no special ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3355704698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71534368031 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.2513813081 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258947716364 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11267446275 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634760793582 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186291517914 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505167491815 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.