It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages?
Life is full of surprises be it personal or professional. Everybody at a certain point in life are at dilemma when it comes to taking risks. There are situations where risk can bring in big fortunes while other times it can lead to loss. Hence, there are both pros and cons under such circumstances. This essay will discuss both the positive and negative perspective.
To commence, when people take risk there is fifty percent chance of good or bad, people tending to take risks look on the bright side of things. When one learns to take challenges in life, it can lead to better life. For instance, one of my friend named Natalie who was offered a job by an organisation in a foreign country. She was doubtful about this because the company was started very recently and had not seen any profits yet. Moreover, opting for this job would mean a new life, new place a whole lot of transformation. She being a risk-taker took this opportunity and years later it all turned out to be fine. It is necessary that one takes calculated risks in life because not very challenge ends with success.
Despite the benefits, there is an ugly side to this. There is a fifty percent chance for a risk to turn out to be adverse. It becomes difficult for people to handle negative outcomes as it can lead to mental stress and sometimes depression. For example, nowadays there are many people who have started their own business online, not all of them are profitable there are many that have died due to lack of customers. All the hard work and resources goes in vain. There are instances where such business owners have gone bankrupt. Hence, risk involves a lot of dangers to the extent that people can face death. So, the question arises is it even worth taking risks?
In conclusion, taking blind risk is a bad idea. But rather, it depends on the circumstances and one’s financial and emotional intelligence to face it irrespective of personal or professional.
- Studying foodways what foods people eat and how they produce acquire prepare and consume them is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 83
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 82
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys 89
- Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can lead to loss. Hence, there are both pros and cons under such circumstances. ...
^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
... job would mean a new life, new place a whole lot of transformation. She being a risk-tak...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...lace a whole lot of transformation. She being a risk-taker took this opportunity and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69186046512 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62231216534 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55523255814 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6502735366 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246447830755 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672521175724 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063349996873 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146500568241 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296812469594 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.