It is impossible to help all people in the world,so goverments should only focus on peoplle in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that these days, a number of countries, especially developing ones, choose to engage in foreign affairs for a variety of reasons. Although some critics may be out of tune with governments’ foreign aid, it is, in effect, vital for every nation.
It is advisable that thriving countries should actively collaborate with underdeveloped ones in terms of dealing with hardships. Since many poor countries have been struggling to meet their citizens’ living standards, let alone tackle social issues, voluntarily external support is one of the most effective ways to help those countries out. For example, when Ebola broke out in Africa a few years ago, many well-trained European doctors were sent in to take care of impoverished patients whose countries were facing run-down infrastructure in medical conditions, which then helps to outstandingly bring off setting back the epidemic. In addition, it is evident that developing nations would have much potential when it comes to finance and workforce, to name a few. This means its government should appropriate money for helping others rather than pour it into futile projects.
Another compelling reason to get involved in foreign affairs is that not only the aided countries but also the aiding ones benefit from it. First, if the foreign support were successful, the country would lend its name to the world’s market. In fact, more trust would be obtained so that future conferences with other nations would sail through with flying color. Second, having made an effort to aid foreign countries, a nation can witness the stability of its economy. For instance, when a member of ASEAN is susceptible to the economic crisis, it is imperative for its neighbors to provide appropriate aids as otherwise, they would then have to suffer.
In conclusion, governments should take great care of both locals and external people who are in need for the sake of the world. If not, the nation may fall into disrepute and run into difficulties when there comes an unsolvable issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-21 | chipchippham | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16012084592 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79235153867 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634441087613 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8407377233 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998044515286 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354385188379 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351364305719 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551652419647 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369657380891 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.