It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. to what extent do you agree or disagree
Some people consider that helping all needy people in other countries is impossible so that the governments should only focus on helping people in their own country. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this point of view.
One reason is that It is possible to provide people in need with help due to the development of modern transportation. Technology nowadays allows government agencies and non-government organizations to provide aid within hours even to remote areas of the world. If it were not for these organizations, the consequences could be worse than we expected. For example, the recent tsunami in Japan left hundreds of thousands of people homeless and in desperate of food, but thanks to the advance of the technology, the response of governments around the world was immediate. Soon, food and equipment were delivered by air, along with medical staff and medicine.
Another reason is that It is true to share a moral responsibility to help those people who lack necessities. This help has no geographical boundaries and governments should consider this as their international obligation. It is unreasonable to place responsibility only on charities and international organizations such as UNICEF or Red Cross. Thus governments should not only provide international assistance as part of their budget and must also help these organizations in the financial problem.
In conclusion, although governments have many problems that they are dealing with in their own country, they also have the moral responsibility to fulfill the international obligation to people in need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | lanhhoang | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Hau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | Dongvo | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-07 | grahamoneil | 11 | view |
| 2017-10-31 | o0olynero0o | 73 | view |
- It is more important for children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. do you agree or disagree about this opinion 61
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example What do you think 89
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one's own family. Why do people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...anizations such as UNICEF or Red Cross. Thus governments should not only provide int...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.384 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26176393996 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2032447213 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354741110409 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117136261445 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134803258511 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23118468326 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146775545868 0.056905535591 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.