It is more important to have a good family than to have friends. Family can always compensate for absence of friendship.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of the family members and friends in adolescents' shaping have recently become the temperature topic for discussions. In this regard, some people believe that real kinship is to compensation for any friends interactions, their opponents consider that friends cannot be replaced by any family members. Although I agree that family plays a crucial role in shaping child's life, I am convinced that it cannot substitute friends.
On the one hand, family members greatly influence the younger generation in moral aspects guiding the children than peers. To be precise, parents are sure to prevent their offsprings from yielding to destructive habits that are popular with the teenager companies. The right conversations may contribute to understanding that smoking and taking drugs are disruptive for the young organisms. For example, according to a Russian scientist Kim v I, youngsters with strong family bounds are less prone to developing drug addiction. Thus, the roles of a mother and a father are likely to influence the descendants in a more positive way that the peers group.
On the other hand, the communication with the representatives of the same age group is beneficial for forming the process of socialising. Children learn the options of defending their peivate boundaries by means of the intercourses with other teenagers. Moreover, the personal traits and peculiarities better uncover among other youngsters that is vital for creating healthy social life in future. For example, as per the American Studies, the kids' leader features flower at the age of 8-12 at the atmosphere of the permanent positive and negative interactions with the peers. Thereby, the adolescent environment is important for any child in terms of shaping the idea of the social communications.
To sum up, even though family is vital for teenager's maturation, it is not sufficient for an adolescent. A child is to communicate with friends for building the patterns of interactions in social life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- Studying art in school improves students performance in other subjects because it is easier for multi skilled students to learn new things That s why art should be obligatory in schools 94
- To what extent Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead 78
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... vital for creating healthy social life in future. For example, as per the American Studi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...ample, as per the American Studies, the kids leader features flower at the age of 8-...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3417721519 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05000912788 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5520632217 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213865917011 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688991234016 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062306403727 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134628379393 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728593398588 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.