It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
History is considered a compulsory subject in the educational program of each region or nation. While some individuals argue that schools should teach children local history rather than the history of the world, I still believe that the history of the country and the globe have different values.
On the one hand, amongst there are several advantages associated with learning about the local past. Firstly, the most significant of which is to understand what happened in the past, pupils are aware of the hardship in the long revolution of construction and protection of the previous generations. For example, about the freedom of the country, Vietnamese youngsters will be proud and grateful for the value of the way of life and liberty that they enjoy today. In addition, history reflects the traditional cultures and ancient structures which have changed a lot today. As a result, the younger generation will gain a deeper understanding of each traditional event and take responsibility motivating for the next generations.
On the other hand, we cannot underestimate the role of studying world history. The first reason relates to the connections between our local history and other countries. Thus, children not only learn logical thinking about linking the different events but also have a wide overview of global history. Moreover, in the integrated world, comprehending history is necessary for schoolchildren. Armed with this broader perspective, it will be easier for them to form a mutual understanding if they know about the origins and past development of other people across the world.
To sum up, I would argue that it is equally important for schoolboys and schoolgirls to study local history as well as world history.
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office 89
- The picture below shows the plan of a museum in 1998 and after some changes were made in it in 2008 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 100
- To succeed in business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25539568345 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94542820858 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3510015047 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336990555387 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111487328611 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774881082055 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206307840365 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389096215638 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.