It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been an increasingly popularised opinion that students should prioritize learning local history over global one. From my perspective, I partly agree with the statement for the following reasons.
On the one hand, having a solid understanding of world history is undeniably beneficial for schoolchildren to a certain extent. Having studied the past, students have a chance to learn from the successes and failures of older generations. Children from developing and underdeveloped countries, for instance, can learn from the rapid development of Japan's overall economy after the war, specifically their astute way of thinking about how to generate the most revenue or decide which field to invest in. Additionally, knowing world history is a requisite for global citizens. The rich history of the world helps students acknowledge their home country’s position in the international market. Subsequently, they can come up with innovative ways to contribute to national development that are suitable for the current situation of their country.
On the other hand, students should already have a thorough understanding of local history before learning about world history. History partly reflects the past's society, ideologies, and cultures. Developing knowledge of domestic history means developing knowledge of the unique cultures of the learners’ countries, which subsequently enhances their cultural identity. Another point worth considering is that the ancestors’ experiences can be more valuable than those from world history. Due to cultural and geographical differences, when students want to apply any measures of a great man in the world’s history to solve any social issues of the nation, they have to modify them to suit the case. Conversely, the ancestors had come up with an effective method that was suitable for the local geography. For instance, in 938, Ngo Quyen had taken advantage of the Bach Dang River to protect Vietnam against Chinese invaders. Later on, in 1288, Tran Quoc Tuan used the same strategy to fight Mongolia, creating one of the greatest victories in Vietnamese military history.
In conclusion, while having a broad understanding of world history exerts several advantages, schoolchildren should learn domestic history first. It is advisable that schools teach national history to primary and secondary school students, and international history to high school students.
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is easier and more affordable for people to visit other countries Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pasts'' or 'past's'?
Suggestion: pasts'; past's
...ld history. History partly reflects the pasts society, ideologies, and cultures. Deve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64207650273 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03691074916 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581967213115 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0998982351 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327966263886 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104128741631 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726704827359 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20306476708 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203618251982 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.