It is a common belief that the idea of supplying college for large amounts of young people is impossible and useless. I believe that providing almost all students with access to tertiary education is unreachable, however, I ensure that it will provide students with more practical skills and career prospects in the near future. To begin with, students will be able to participate in Hands-On activities. For instance, students usually have to socialize with their peers to learn interpersonal and team working skills, therefore they can learn more valuable experiences. One study, for example, shows that adolescents can build strong character and personality development by participating in different extracurricular activities at school. This study offers strong proof that university places have a direct relationship with students' lives. On top of that, providing college for young people will help them to have more opportunities in terms of finding future careers in this knowledge-based society, students are required to have not only real-life skills but also theoretical knowledge to apply to different jobs, according to a recent survey young people overwhelmingly stated that they were likely to find a job compared to others who did not have formal qualifications from the university. This demonstrates how important university is for young people.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Thuylepham
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11363061943 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650717703349 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.431629044 49.4020404114 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.375 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864657020294 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438683686188 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287051839997 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864657020294 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.