It is often claimed that electronic devices will soon replace paper books Do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

It is often claimed that electronic devices will soon replace paper books.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

People have always enjoyed reading since Biblical times. The issue whether paper books are going to disappear due to the invention of electronic gadgets is often argued. I completely disagree with this opinion and think that reading hard copy books will never become unpopular.

First of all, many people love reading a paper book since it has a specific smell that an electronic gadget cannot show. The scent of a hard copy book helps a human to enjoy the process of reading while electronic devices do not own such characteristic. For example, the founder of Apple Steve Jobs had always emphasized his love for the smell of books and said that there is nothing to replace it. In other words, a lot of people prefer to read hard copy books owning to the unique book odour that electronic gadgets will never possess.

In addition, electronics always require charging whereas paper books are permanently ready to use. People constantly need to charge an electronic device to be in a position to exploit it. Books do not demand charging at all. So, humans will not stop using hard copy books because unlike electronic devices, books do not require invariable charging. For instance, a contemporary author Derek Walcott does not use electronic devices for reading due to his habit of forgetting to charge electronic equipment. In that case, he prefers to bring with him paper books only. That is why the issue of charging is important for people and they will never find the substitute for hard copy books.

To conclude, reading paper books is indispensable because of the distinctive odour atmosphere and such characteristic of a book that gives a person an opportunity to enjoy reading with no need of constant charging.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (17 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-26 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 84 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96206896552 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63607326966 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4591830141 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191239145647 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07669695995 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362544083194 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124490865049 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493494024788 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.