It seems that with the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people prefer to write letters. Will the skill of writing disappear completely?
Much attention has been drawn to whether modernlizing by smartphones and digital computers can replace the role of writing letter. This essay, however, believes that both technological devices and normal writing letters do have some advantages and disadvantages. One one hand, mobile phones can be convenient in daily life of many users just by some simple steps. On the other hand, writing skill by letters is also the way to go in order to make a good impression.
As for the role of mobile phone, it offers a wide range of apps for users to fulfill their hard work skills. Assuming a staff was under the snow with tons of tasks, the modern technological devices, such as Iphone, could support their user by making plans and schedules directly, just by a simple voice. Moreover, writing on screen is also the best experience for anyone, who is a technophile. Not only does smartphone control the span of tough teeks for his boss perfectly, but it is also a trustworthy due to his barriers protecting the private information's user. Eventhough, the repetition laziness by looking at the blue screen all day can destroy the vision of customer, it can deny that digital technology is a main part of normal citizens these days.
In terms of common letter writing role, a lovely word in a common letter can reinforce any relationships concretely. A real mundane, such as academic subject, can easily attract lots of people through the gogeous orders of letters writing neatly. As a result of constant practice, an elite writer does replace a two-side page to a masterpiece mavelously. However, every skills always have a defective side, which might ruin all messages just by a small mistake. For instance, the reader is absolutely irritating whenever the construction of line in a letter is messy.
In conclusion, mobile phones and computers are indeed becoming more popular than writing on paper, considering the convenience that technology has brought about. However, the art of writing would still maintain its special place in human society for the forseeable future as far as emotional interactions are concerned.
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of a large extended family Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: One
...have some advantages and disadvantages. One one hand, mobile phones can be convenient i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'informations'' or 'information's'?
Suggestion: informations'; information's
... to his barriers protecting the private informations user. Eventhough, the repetition lazine...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06837606838 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8233345119 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.601763756 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1875 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159209357925 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526485115073 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399141915827 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102472496634 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331681057304 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.