It should be more expensive to make sugary products less appealing to consumers in order to encourage them to consume less. Many manufactured foods and drinks contain high levels of sugar, which can cause many health problems. Do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, it is widely believed that sugar has been increasingly consumed in people’s daily meals, which can result in several adverse impacts on their health, and the products with high amounts of sugar should be more exorbitant. I, personally, totally agree with these statements.
For a variety of reasons, overconsuming sugary foods and beverages may lead to serious health problems and illnesses. To be more specific, these products tend to be more affordable than healthy food as they contain fewer valuable nutrients for the body. Therefore, they seem to be the principal selection for low-income households or people under the poverty line. The more sweet food they eat, the more obesity they suffer from. To demonstrate, according to a survey in 2018 in Cambodia, more than 32% of poor people were overweight and endured diabetes because of high sugar content in their blood.
There is a mountain of motives why the government had better impose greater taxes on sugary products in order to make them less attractive to the consumers. First, if the prices are so far extravagant and lavish, people may eat sweet food and soft drink. As a result, the number of cases diagnosing diabetes would sooner plummet. Second, when poor-quality food is pricey, individuals may purchase nourishing one instead. Thus, the local authorities should diminish the cost of healthy and nutritional food for more customers, especially those in the middle class, to afford these wholesome and fresh products.
Taking everything into consideration, it reinforces my perspective that sugary foods and beverages can adversely harm people’s health. However, augmenting the prices of these products may mitigate this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-01 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | Tran Phan Gia Thu | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38970588235 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83029978727 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636029411765 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4688440109 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267151828692 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775054140263 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582850847958 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152132544832 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035777625316 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.