In modern society, water shortage can be considered as an alarming issue on a global scale. While the causes of this situation are varied, some methods can be taken to such a problem.
To begin with, there are some reasons why water crisis is a global issue. Firstly, more and more factories and industrial zones are built to meet consumer need. Therefore, the amount of waste from industrial activities has increased significantly; however, industrial wastes which released into environment such as streams, lakes and rivers was almost untreated. As a results, water resources are seriously polluted as well as being not recycled for using. In addition, ineffective use and management of water is also one of the main reasons which cause water deficit. In particular, excessive use of groundwater in agricultural industries is leading to reduced production and waste of water. For example, more than 70% of the global groundwater is used by humans for farming, and most of this water is wasted due to leaky pipes and poor irrigation techniques.
Fortunately, this issue can be tackled by a number of practical solutions by both government and individuals. In terms of government, they can pass laws to punish companies and businesses that damage the water environment by illegally discharging waste. By imposing stricter penalties on these businesses, it serves as a deterrent to reduce water pollution which is the root cause of water scarcity. Moreover, some sustainable water management measures should be implemented by the authority. In other words, they should look for optimal options in the use and development of water resources. Furthermore, with proper training and education as well as proper guidance on the use of water resources, this will greatly contribute to preventing water resources from running out.
To conclude, the underlying reasons for water deficit are varied. Nevertheless, there are some suggestions can be carried out by not only governments but also individuals to improve this problem.
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that it would be a waste of money 84
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in sociely such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 82
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species Some people think that is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give yo 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...kes and rivers was almost untreated. As a results, water resources are seriously polluted...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 777, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nting water resources from running out. To conclude, the underlying reasons for ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32087227414 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98657561969 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.567102593 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.470588235 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6470588235 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226338460407 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769036164392 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053132220575 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159796631619 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628862706965 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.