Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In the contemporary society, there is a domination of megamalls over neibourhood and small stores. This essay will disclose the pros and cons of the trend and explain why this can be negative to the society.
At first glance, it is obvious that super-regional shopping centers provide buyers with convenience and a wide range of purchasable goods. Megamalls are usually anchored by department stores of numerous brands, especially apparel brands. This gives people a wide range to choose the best-fit item. For example, whenever there is a demand for sport shoes, customers can visit Adidas or Nike stores, which are anchoring in the mall within a short time. Additionally, large shopping centers often have entertaining amenities such as cinema, and also a vast convenient parking space. Therefore, going shopping, customer could think of it as an enjoyable trip or an one-day holiday.
On the other hand, however, there are visible consequences that negatively affect both society and businesses. Firstly, the majority of brands occupying leasable centers are famous brands or ones with big financial capital. As a result, when buyers tend to visit super-regional malls, small-scale companies of the private sector will witness their potential customers phasing out. Finally, this would lead to a total domination of huge corporation, and neighbourhood department stores would likely disappear. Moreover, because megamalls frequently locate on large leasable areas in countryside, people have to travel there on cars. Thus, there will be increase in use of private vehicles and consequently rise in traffic congestion. Take Chinese as an example, when it comes to the end of a short holiday, megacities like Beijing will surely experience severe congestion at the entrance to the town, some time it would take residents 24 hours to process.
In conclusion, megamalls worth being predominant, due to their convenient nature and various availability. Despite that, it would lead to traffic problems and the decease of small business. Therefore, I believe it is rather a negative development, and the widely construction of such centers should be considered meticulously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. the provided bar chart illustrates the differences between the population of wealthy nations and developing nations during the 73
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon. Columbia, Yamhill, WashingtonSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 11
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes what are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...uld think of it as an enjoyable trip or an one-day holiday. On the other hand, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47477744807 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99492536899 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611275964392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9758447237 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112655792967 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303595715384 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310922483601 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062833549269 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028017410946 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.