Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Replacing small groceries by the department stores is rapidly gaining popularity all over the world and I believe this is a negative development. This essay will discuss reasons for my view.
Firstly, the inadequacy of small retailers leads to the decrease in local living quality. In fact, the family run businesses offer the employment and income for households in the local. Therefore, none of small stores which is usually owned by the people in the villages has a result of the increase in unemployment rates at that place. Hence, their income may not be enough for living standard such as not having enough money spending for the their bills or tuition for their children.
Secondly, customers could pay more money for the products that are sold in the anchor stores than in the smaller ones. It is because the owner of the department might suffer much expenditure on different sections such as rent, decoration and staffs, so the cost of the items is higher than their real value. For example, the price of a skirt which is sold in the market may be two times lower than the same one in the supermarket.
Finally, it wastes more time to go shopping in the large store rather the in the small ones. The fact of that, there are various products in the chain stores, from garments to foods, from basic electricity devices to the cutting-edge technological gadgets, so people are easier to be attracted and lost much time to go around. Moreover, queueing in the long line for paying becomes prevalent in the big shops and that makes people to waste time. In contrast, if people go shopping in the small retailers, they are prone to ask, pay and take what they need in minutes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...as not having enough money spending for the their bills or tuition for their children. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73129251701 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50798391946 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6457934704 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115955540529 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453011189342 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609681661553 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651253372696 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543028275265 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.