Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than on building a large collection of paper books. To what extent do you agree?
With the usefulness of the modern technology, there is a significant decrease in the number of people who choose to read paper books in preference to using e-books. Therefore, it is suggested that libraries should put more investment in developing there technological resources rather than building a large pile of paper books. However, I totally disagree with this statement for 2 reasons.
At the outset, the essence of the libraries does not commensurate with the presence of high technology which is assumed to help people acquire more knowledge. Initially, it is obvious that there are a lot of valuable, useful books that are not available on the internet or other forms of technological advances. As a result, people will find it useless and a waste of money when putting a lot of resources to upgrade the technological devices in the libraries which contains an colossal number of the greatest books of all the time. Furthermore, libraries are also considered as the most appropriate place to study. If there are more and more technological resources in this space, it is difficult for people to focus on their work as they keep their mind on using these high-tech appliances.
Apart from that, I believe the benefits of reading paper books outweigh those of utilizing technology. It is scientifically proven that when people read paper books, it is highly likely that they will remember it much longer, which contributes to boost the productivity of reading books dramatically. In addition to that, technology is the most probable factor distracting people from reading. According to a survey, when choosing e-books, most of people only read some first pages of the books as they are easily distracted by other programs. Not only does it not result in any positive outcome but it is also time-consuming and low-productive. In contrast, paper books give people the chance to fully concentrate on their reading and immerse completely in another world.
To recapitulate, I wholeheartedly disagree that there should be more efforts in enhancing the technological facilities in the libraries.
- some people think when a person travels into a different culture they should adapt to the local practices and customs. what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country’s success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country’s success? Do you think one factor is more import 84
- Exercise is important for our health, but are there things that are more important? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...devices in the libraries which contains an colossal number of the greatest books o...
^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ing to a survey, when choosing e-books, most of people only read some first pages of the books...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20294117647 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06566542504 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7813043279 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209502121841 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723860760931 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901286397618 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135620115417 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073328450259 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.