Living in a country where you have to peak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, moving to foreign countries for a better life becomes popular. It is said that many challenges can merge when you have a life in a nation that you have to use another language instead of you mother language. In my opinion, I totally agree with this point of view.
First of all, living in a foreign nation requesting another language, of course, can cause language barrier. To more specific, the difference in language can lead to many problems in practical and social activities. Communication is the essential activity in the daily life so language barriers can lead to the limit of understanding in living and socializing. Even there are many native words that people from another places can understand leading to the loss of conversation. Moreover, difference in language can decrease the performance of you work. For instance, the loss of fully acknowledge foreign languages can make you misunderstanding the task, contracts or even disciplines of the company. Therefore, language barrier can cause many challenges in daily activities.
Another factor to be concerned is that living in a country with foreign language can lead to cultural shock and cultural counter. In other words, there are a huge difference between the cultures of two countries once living in another nation which can raise issue. Acknowledging fully a different culture is very difficult which can be learn in a short time. Hence, sometimes your actions, not on purpose, can offend another person or sometimes another people’s irritate you. For example, in Vietnam, you can use the same bowl of soup in meal which is seen as rude action in Japan. Cultural differences can cause many problems when living abroad.
In conclusion, living in a different nation with foreign language can raise many issues which challenge us in social and practical life.
- the chart below shows how frequently people in USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The maps show the Islip centre now and its in the future after a plan. 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The plans below show the layout of an university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87282091332 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503333333333 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5321067437 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3529411765 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294665242412 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111699826458 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526631817036 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209068581765 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358205882398 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.