With closer communication and cooperation worldwidely, people are traveling or immigrating more frequently in modern world. I am quite convinced by the claim that speaking a foreign language in a country could bring many problems, both socially and practically.
Being limited by the level of a foreign language, individuals might have to deal with many unexpected practical problems. Some Europeans or Americans who have never had Chinese food before may find difficulty in ordering food in china. From my experience, some foreigners in china will choose some restaurants only because there are pictures of food in the menu. Or even, they have to go to world chained fast food restaurants such as Burger King and KFC for easier choice.
In addition, some social problems might also caused due to linguistic reasons and different cultural backgrounds in a foreign country. Based on the argument that most of citizens in china cities do not have any religious belief, they might seem too interested in the religious ceremonies or other activities related to local religions, even some being too private to be spotted. There are reports that Chinese people travelling to Muslim countries went to the local place for appriciation of the architectures in a religion area but were sentenced into jail because it was considered rude behavior to watch the ceremony as a tourist.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the world is becoming more and more connected, some social and practical problems can still be possibly caused if you live in a country with a foreign language. A good suggestion would be to learn the local language and culture as much as you can before moving there.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 86
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblems, both socially and practically. Being limited by the level of a foreign ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Burger King and KFC for easier choice. In addition, some social problems might ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the citizens') or simply say ''most citizens''.
Suggestion: most of the citizens; most citizens
...ign country. Based on the argument that most of citizens in china cities do not have any religio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or to watch the ceremony as a tourist. In conclusion, despite the fact that the...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s much as you can before moving there.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, even so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82822986389 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4624150744 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275751642248 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998662741752 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953681093125 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166955265826 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824648410341 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.