Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Residing in a new nation is always considered to be difficult, especially when people are unable to speak their mother tongue. This might have detrimental effects on new inhabitants’ social life as well as their everyday life. In my opinion, I fully agree with this statement.
Having to accommodate themselves to a foreign language could be problematic socially. A new country also means a new culture with different and exciting experience, and a variety of traditions. So being able to speak the language would help people to adapt easier. Not being able to fully understand their cultures might offend the natives. If people can not communicate, they might have misunderstandings with the locals which lead to conflicts Moreover, they might lose the opportunity to know more about the unique culture of that country which is one of the main reasons why people choose to live in other nations.
In addition, practical issues might arise from communicating in a foreign language. People might have trouble conveying their thought in daily activities, as well as, being able to fully comprehend others. For example, many students travel abroad for university which put them in a dilemma of not being to speak their first language in their everyday life. Some might fail to understand their lectures, finish their homework or make friends at school. Beside that, when going out for food, some immigrants might have trouble ordering or when they go shopping, the language might hinder them from getting what they really want. The consequence of this is serious. Eventually, people could alien themselves from others due to communication issue.
In conclusion, living in a nation that does not speak their first language bring about obstacles for people, socially and practically, as there might be clash in cultures and a misinterpretation daily. However, people can improve this by truing to take up the new language to have a better understanding of their new country.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-11 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
2021-07-15 | jaseya | 58 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Residing in a new nation is always consi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I fully agree with this statement. Having to accommodate themselves to a fo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le choose to live in other nations. In addition, practical issues might aris...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... others due to communication issue. In conclusion, living in a nation that d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2125 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90018857146 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.72857382 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1176470588 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166179199193 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065434595178 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459436811698 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118556339746 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211159711452 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.