Một số người nghĩ rằng sức khỏe tốt là rất quan trọng đối với mỗi người, vì vậy dịch vụ y tế không nên được điều hành bởi các công ty vì lợi nhuận. Ưu điểm của dịch vụ y tế tư nhân có vượt trội hơn nhược điểm không.
It is a fact that the issue of ensuring the health of people for non-commercial treatment in private clinical facilities. Has been many people concerned, that participating in this Service would introduce both pros and cons, but I think that the drawbacks do outweigh the benefits.
To begin with, shares responsibilities with state-owned healthcare institutions in taking care of the public’s health. That means, reducing the pressure on state-owned healthcare institutions in terms of overload of patients and finance. Another plus point is sufficient facilities and professional capability in state hospitals, these use modern machines and good medicine in the treatment process for patients, as a consequence, creating feeling comfortable for the patient and restoring their health faster
On the other hand, i argue that the disadvantages of this trend would prove to be more important. First, it has encouraged the discrimination between the rich and the poor, in other words, hospital fees are high merely wealthy people while the poor cannot afford to pay the bills and would be denied access to treatment. In addition, the hospital is managed by profit-oriented companies, in particular reducing labor costs and hiring unqualified doctors. As the result, not only the patient is misdiagnosed or not receiving proper treatment, and also threatens their survival. Furthermore, private healthcare insurance is very costly, and many people simply have no opportunity for it.
In short, even though they offer better service and more cutting-edge medical equipment than their public-sector counterparts, negative aspects of the private providers such as making the further gap between classes and unethical staff overshadow the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-09 | jadenguyen | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-09 | jadenguyen | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-09 | jadenguyen | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-09 | jadenguyen | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-09 | jadenguyen | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...eir health faster On the other hand, i argue that the disadvantages of this tr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, i think, in addition, in particular, in short, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64772727273 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17735753344 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9648705239 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.1 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.