The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. with this statement?
It is argued that public libraries should focus on providing books instead of investing in digital devices. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this view.
On the one hand, I believe that using hi-tech gadget minimize the time to find and arrange the information better more. Even individuals need to come across the data which will be easy with a computer at the click of a button. For example, when students have a variety of assignments that ought to finish in a short time. It is extremely simple to go into the community library for research on the computer. Indeed, users can fulfill their projects on time. That is the reason why the technology is integral to search the knowledge.
On the other hand, digital resources can be attracted more readers and protect the environment. Initially, children tend to listen to the summary of a book converted to the form of video rather than reading the full text. It also can assist them to remember and grasp the main content. Furthermore, tree truck has used the material for making paper books. In another word, producing paper has to destroy the forest which is the habitat of many animals, and protect our life from catastrophic floods or hurricanes.
In conclusion, although printed books will never lose their importance, the young generation is moving towards digital information and learning. In my opinion, I would prefer to access digital and attractive video content in a public library instead of going through lengthy printed text.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | VietAn97 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Le Minh Anh | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-15 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-23 | prempro | 67 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 77
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 67
- The table shows the percentage of students giving a good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wards digital information and learning. In my opinion, I would prefer to access di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98412698413 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62218426891 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2361249245 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171441298164 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475096766094 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508271721246 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107631366462 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667594975502 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.