Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
In the cutting – edge of technology, computer devices has become prevalent in modern society so some people assumed that spending money on maintaining public libaries is not necessary . However, from my perspective, I am not in favour of this opinion.
First of all, libraries are appropriate places to concentrate on reading books or completing works due to their peaceful atmosphere. For example, the number of students who focus on studying hard tend to finish their homework in libraries rather than other places. Because instead of learning, being seduced by entertainment applications on smartphones or laptops on is inevitable. Additionally, if spending much times on working with computers can cause negative problems which impact on vision of users such as short sightedness or eyestrain.
Besides, not everyone is interested in accessing information by computers. There are several impoverished people who can not afford to pay for smart devices such as e-books, laptops, still continue reading book in local libraries. Another thing is that adoption of new technology like smartphones, computers seem to be unfeasible for elderly people as previous generations do not know how to use these devices that did not appear universally few decades ago.
In conclusion, it can not be denied that even though computer technology brings a lot of advantageous effects for readers, it can not replace the crucial position of libraries. Thus, I believe that government authorities should invest money to upgrade library infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | iceber9 | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | KatherineLQ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | hin07 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Hau Nguyen | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...taining public libaries is not necessary . However, from my perspective, I am not ...
^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her places. Because instead of learning, being seduced by entertainment applicati...
^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...s inevitable. Additionally, if spending much times on working with computers can cau...
^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oney to upgrade library infrastructure.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, still, thus, another thing, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48739495798 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08740117374 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.701680672269 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.88353779 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215079585501 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623689810802 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506214687073 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118483998073 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438763565012 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.