Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that the most effective way to render society happier is to narrow the income gap between rich and poor individuals. Personally, I agree with this notion for several reasons.
To begin with, the income inequality can become a breeding ground for social unrest and crimes such as vandalism and theft, which are key drivers behind distress and fear among society. This is because many poor individuals may be under the impression that the rich are evading taxes and stealing from them, thus potentially leading to crimes or strikes and protests against the higher class. In addition, the pay gap means that rich people are presented with more opportunities in life, while those below the poverty line are stuck with a limited number of job options. This is due largely to the fact that the former group can afford high-quality education and receive essential qualifications, while the latter cannot. Therefore, it is sensible to say that the wealth inequality must be brought down in order to eliminate the aforementioned issues and bring about happiness for society.
Moreover, the alternatives to ensuring society’s well-being would be much less effective and feasible. One option would be for the government to adopt a tough-on-crime approach by imposing strict punishments on law offenders to make society safer and happier. However, this approach fails to address the root cause of crimes, which is the income discrepancy between the rich and poor. Another option is to provide free education for everyone so that they have more chances to seek well-paying jobs and improve their lives, but this strategy is quite financially problematic, given the colossal amounts of funds it would require. Finally, the authorities can provide free entertainment like concerts and sports games for the public to help people de-stress, but it is unlikely that people who struggle to make ends meet would be able to care for entertainment.
In summary, it is my conviction that eradicating economic inequality would be the best way to achieve happiness among society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | tttran12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Lunar Tran | 59 | view |
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some countries are considering imposing curfews in which teenagers will not be allowed outdoors at night unless they are accompanied by an adult To what extent do you agree or disagree with this policy 84
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ective way to render society happier is to narrow the income gap between rich and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in summary, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22023809524 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82104553357 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610119047619 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.403542982 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143825138606 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570337702603 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691109933274 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10747278272 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723166702528 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.