In many cities, many people are living in large apartment blocks. Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, more and more people are accommodating in large apartment buildings especially in big cities where the population is constantly growing. This matter has both upsides and downsides for cities and people living in them.
From dwellers' perspective, living in an apartment complex might give a chance for socializing. This is because there are more people sharing the same building and naturally they encounter each other quite often. This would mean they can get to know each other, perhaps plan and do activities together, help each other, which will lead to a social community. Living in solidarity and social community can bring well-being to everyone.
From city planning perspective, these buildings are necessary as there are more and more people who need housing. Instead of building single houses, it is more feasible, economical and practical to construct apartments to meet the needs of cities' growing population. This is true particularly for small-sized but crowded cities as there not enough space to provide housing for everyone.
Having said these, the downside of living in tall and large apartments should be addressed as well. That is, sharing a living space lessens the privacy of individuals, which might not suit everyone. In an apartment building, there are at least two next-door neighbours that can be heard even if they talk just a bit louder. Furthermore, some people are just not accustomed to the lifestyle of apartment-living. In other words, they are not aware of the social rules such as not smoking in the building, not leaving the garbage outside, respecting others' privacy.
In conclusion, living in an apartment has pros and cons. Even though it might be a lot less private than living in a single house, personally, I believe that sharing the living space with others in an apartment-complex, either because of the necessity or preference, appears to be more advantageous when socialising aspect and urban planning are taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-26 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, at least, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25078369906 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91098873345 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.384874966 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236422526996 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850046709379 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561923449255 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1441186825 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536647335426 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.