It is undeniable that increasing number of people prefer living in large apartment blocks in most of the cities nowadays, and I believe this development has more advantages compared with disadvantages.
On the one hand, apartment housing system is comprised of number of positives. I believe, one evident benefit people get by living in such cramped schemes is, lower housing rent. Since city dwellers are subjected to large number of other expenses, they believe housing is one of the expenses in which they can compromise and optimize their monthly budget. As a result, the saving resulted from this step can be directed towards other crucial expenses such as, tuition fees of their children, medication of elderly and daily commute. In contrast, if this option would not have been available, city habitants would have been suffering from cash crunch. Nonetheless, thanks to large apartment blocks, which allows people with feasibility to manage their own finances.
On the other hand, such places may also some drawbacks. Firstly, people living in such spaces need to face space crunch. In other words, since rental for this these blocks is less, the accessible area that people get to live is also extremely small. This type of living may take away individual privacy and is often seen as aggravating individual temper. For instance, one survey conducted by times magazine mentioned that people who live in large apartment blocks are 30% percent more aggressive compared with people living in individual houses. Thus, lack of privacy may affect individual behavior.
In conclusion, though living in large apartment blocks have some disadvantages, I personally feel, saving that middle-class families achieve is more satisfying for their daily living. Not only this, but I think people will continue living in such places, who aspire for better future of their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
... the one hand, apartment housing system is comprised of number of positives. I believe, one evi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
.... For instance, one survey conducted by times magazine mentioned that people who live...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62173228275 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561872909699 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0380351247 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302843598242 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987813637926 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811014028851 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210825801171 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066547975245 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.