In many countries, mainly tourist, but not local people, visit museums and historical site.
Why does this happen?
What can be done to attract more to attract more local people to visit these place?
In contemporary society, local museums and historical monuments are mostly visited by outsiders. This phenomenon begs the question of why these sites do not attract local people and which practices could be taken into consideration to make them more appealing to them.
To begin with, I presume that the contributions to this concerning pattern vary from intrinsic factors, such as people’s priorities, to extrinsic factors, such as the way tourist offices carry out services. Firstly, it is widely observed that local people tend to prioritize their financial issues and lucrative things which drives them to spend most of their lifetime at work. In contrast, while the local have less leisure time to make a trip, the tourists who are ready to spend their budget on recreational facilities find local heritage an intriguing field to explore. Secondly, extrinsic factors might result from the operation of tour services. Some services are surprisingly expensive which leads to a drop in the local tendency to visit these ancient places.
Nevertheless, nothing is unsolvable if appropriate approaches are put into practice, two of which I find most effective and noteworthy. The first one is shifting target audiences from adults to teenagers by organizing hand-on activities for pupils and students to pay a visit to local historical attractions. This practice not only serves as a relaxing activity after school, enhancing their knowledge, but it could also raise patriotism among individuals. Another tactic that might be worth considering is discounting entrance fees or offering locals free of charge. This responsibility would fall within the scope of the local authority’s regulations to impose tax exemptions.
In conclusion, the factors contributing to the drop in local tourists are manifold and variable. Such promising practices need to be taken into account such as organizing extracurricular activities for students or offering preferential treatment for local people, to prevent this issue from exacerbating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | giathuan1305 | 89 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be taken into account such as organizing extracurricular activities for students ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53697749196 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05770368146 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623794212219 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4170258461 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291648592679 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921276502726 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725900284407 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188327750125 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106577122976 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be taken into account such as organizing extracurricular activities for students ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53697749196 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05770368146 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623794212219 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4170258461 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291648592679 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921276502726 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725900284407 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188327750125 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106577122976 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.