In many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
Many schools suppose that they lack of science students. While there are some problems that cause this trend, it can lead to some negative effects on societies.
First and foremost, it is undoubted that science subjects usually too hard to study, which sometimes as a deterrent. In fact, apart from a few students who get a good grasp of science fields, most students get a sense of anxiety as they have to deal with science subjects such as mathematics and chemical and so on. Worse still, some of students even fall behind their subjects and drop out of their colleges. Furthermore, genders have significant influences on selecting subjects in many countries. For example, while some countries which have to primarily be reliant on tourism sectors tend to allocate more resources on artistic and literate heritages, related majors are more attracted to female students than their male counterparts.
Consequently, this trend results in some disadvantages in our societies. Firstly, a job imbalance probably would be brought about, which negatively effects on societies. While a number of non-science students exert higher pressure on related job markets such as singers and composers, the lack of students who are equipped with science knowledge leads to a decreasing trend of the number of electricians, biologists or plumbers. Secondly, this trend is sometimes not suitable for developments of some countries that need to take industrial sectors into their considerations, so this trend then leads to an increase in unemployment rates in such countries.
In conclusion, the tendency of selecting non-science subjects is quite ubiquitous in some countries for some reasons and this trend brings some drawbacks to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
...cs and chemical and so on. Worse still, some of students even fall behind their subjects and dro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34191176471 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95458112638 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7045768189 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185008648852 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723644896388 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313020591118 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116138207042 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364397373387 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.