There has been a fact that nowadays a major proportion of food that people consume is derived from other areas, rather than that produced where they live because people tend to favour a variety of food. From my perspective, I suppose that the drawbacks of this tendency surpass the merits.
On the one hand, it is admitted that eating various food from outer places has its advantages. Firstly, given the fact that a wide range of food, from vegetables, fruits to meat and beef, for instance, is not always preferable to be grown in particular areas, so the demand for importing such food from outside is unavoidable. Therefore, consumers seem to be among the first beneficiaries of this trend since they certainly gain access to numerous types of food that they can not seek in their local. Secondly, consuming food originated from distant places may promote merchandising between areas or between countries, which eventually raises the gross of the food providers. Moreover, that could also create more jobs that relate to food processing and cargo transporting, partly boost the development of the economy.
On the other hand, the underlying disadvantages of this trend are also profound that I believe that the advantages can not outweigh. Gaining access to a wider limitation of food choice, consumers have to deal with higher costs as food from other regions also additionally bear, at least, the expense for transporting. On top of that, local farmers appear to suffer the worst damage as they fail to seek futures for their farm products. In consequence, those whose products neglected can not make a profit and thus contribute fewer taxes for their local authority. Finally, increased food miles mean that more greenhouse gas, deemed as the main reason for air pollution and global warming, emitted and therefore, has destructive effects on our long-term life quality.
In conclusion, while there are several benefits of inclining to eat food produced from other regions instead of their area, I would maintain that the resulting disadvantages are rather profound and eclipse its advantages.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The world of is changing rapidly Employers would not be able to depend on same job or same working condition for long time in the near future Discuss the cause of rapid change in world of work and how people can be prepared for the future 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 84
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13544668588 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70418063607 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587896253602 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0414022626 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9230769231 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334279448876 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112516283248 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771758811714 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219062512432 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049114736852 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13544668588 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70418063607 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587896253602 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0414022626 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9230769231 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334279448876 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112516283248 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771758811714 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219062512432 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049114736852 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.