In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be
grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has
to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this
development outweigh disadvantages?
Due to globalization, a variety of kinds of food are now available, people have more choice, and tend to opt for new food rather than food grown from local area. In my opinion, this tendency brings more drawbacks than advantages.
Undoubtedly, now people have more options for their meals. Apart from the local food, which used to be the only choice, people in the present can have a decent meal from different countries such as China, Japan or even European countries. Also, with a wide range of ingredients imported, people are freely able to cook on their own. The formula is available from the Internet while all the ingredients can be easily found in only a single trip to a supermarket.
On the other hand, the drawbacks brought by the excessive use of global food can not be ignored. First, it will increase the possibility of going bankrupt of local businesses. Concretely, a large amount of local food would be wasted, thus less workers would be needed. All are due to the significant decline of the local food consumption. Second, global food consumption boost the increasingly use in the number of flight and other heavy transportation systems such as trucks and ships. Those kinds of transport excessively expense a large amount of petrol, which is the main reason responsible for the environmental degradation including air pollution and climate change. Another contribution to this downside is the rising of wasted material due to the large amount of wrappers and packaging products.
In summary, though globalization enables residents a wide range of food. The disadvantages with regard to the local economy and environmental degradation completely outweigh its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun workers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...unt of local food would be wasted, thus less workers would be needed. All are due to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, while, apart from, in summary, such as, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17753623188 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92859429868 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4828633155 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25021370143 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786932957529 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063240715119 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153587923047 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493784994719 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.