It is true that cities are seeing an increase of people who live alone or in small families, while extended families are rarely. In my opinion, these changes are a negative development.
As families become smaller, the traditional family support network is disappearing, and this can have a negative impact on children as they grow up. For example, parents in nuclear families are facing childcare problems, it becomes an expensive and stressful part of daily life. Without the help of grandparents or relatives, busy parents must rely on babysitters, caregivers, or nannies... The absence of an adults' family member means that friends, television, and the Internet become the primary influence on children's behavior. It is no surprise that children without the care of parents are extremely different. Perhaps it will have a rise in psychological and behavioral problems.
The trend of living in nuclear families is becoming more damaging because of the psychological effects of reduced humans interaction. Markedly, individuals who live alone having nobody to talk to, share problems, or discuss any issues that happen in society or in their daily life. They forgot the constant stimulation and hustle and bustle of a large family. Likewise, they are left to live like a normal person for an extended period of time. The lack of human contact is replaced by passive distractions such as television, video games, or Internet surfing. All of them are associated with boredom, loneliness, and have feelings of isolation or even alienation. It is such a harmful disease as a mental illness.
In conclusion, I believe that individuals will thrive in an extended family, so it is worrying that many people choose to live in small family units rather than in a large family.
- Positive and negative view of nuclear power
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Positive and negative view of nuclear power 75
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n babysitters, caregivers, or nannies... The absence of an adults family member m...
^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...ivers, or nannies... The absence of an adults family member means that friends, telev...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...of the psychological effects of reduced humans interaction. Markedly, individuals who ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ve like a normal person for an extended period of time. The lack of human contact is replaced ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17708333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89738792205 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7578116465 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293942095424 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764589292398 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976337330163 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202435751791 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924279333152 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.