In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food This has adverse effects on families individuals and the society Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion

It is true that, fast food is popular nowdays among people and it also has taken place of traditional food. I personally introspect that it is a negative impact on families as well as societies.

To start with, fast food is not healthy. However, mostly people prefer to eat fast food than traditional food. Many people also have addicted to this. It has more causes like it effects directly on people health, heart, liver e.t.c. it is increased obesity, diabetes because in fast food contains lots of sugar and people have to face some types of health issues. Furthermore, they do not know the value of traditional food because it has lots of nutrients in this food. For example, many young children have addicted of fast food nowadays that is why this generation is not fit.

Looking at the other view, parents do not have more time to make meals for their children because job is done nowdays by many parents. In addition, they make fast food for children beacuse it is cheaper than traditional food, it is take less time to make, easily available for any store, it has a good taste. Moreover, fast food also helps to increase the economy rate beacuse fast food companies give work to other small labourers or part-time students. For instance, those students who live far away from their house for studying or doing job so they mostly prefer fast food rather than traditional food.

On a concluding note, undoubtedly, fast food is good for those who do not have time to make meals yet. We must understand that we should only eat nutritional food beacuse it is good for people health.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71684587814 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41063875324 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519713261649 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4872705859 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3100145995 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13744760951 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626853039374 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201735741686 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631613396836 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.