In many countries, truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators.
What are the causes of truancy, and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community?
It is true that unpermitted school leaving has challenged both parents and school authorities. There are three main reasons and two major negative impact on children and the society as a whole.
For truancy, parents, schools and governments should be held responsible for. Firstly, parents are not quit as attentive as they used to be. This will provide a gap when children spend more time with their peers than their families causing them to be influenced by peer pressure. Secondly, school programs are not attractive practically. Many compulsory subjects lack what is needed in real life like communication skills. Furthermore, it seems that a great number of teachers are inadequate regarding classroom management and the essential knowledge which even exacerbate the exhaustive school subjects. Thirdly, governments do not provide bright prospective through job creation. Consequently, school children seems to see disappointing future and tend to choose alternatives which in fact will not actualize what they pursue in their lives.
Turning to possible effects, the most negative impact will be on individuals as they fall behind due to losing the precious time of learning the basic knowledge which is essential for continuation of education leading to inability in finding well-paid job potentially create an unpredictable vicious cycle. Not only these children face unwanted problems, the society also is deprived of skilled workers that are integral part of economic progression. Finally, the victims are prone to fall into trap of crimes and violence.
In summary, carless parents, dull school programs and teachers inadequacy are the reasons of truancy while academic professional underachievement are the negative products of uncontrolled school leaving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-27 | Khalsa kaur | 89 | view |
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste and what solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 81
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- For career development people are required to learn and apply various types of skills at work While speaking in public is an important talent it cannot be accounted as the most significant feature 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ualize what they pursue in their lives. Turning to possible effects, the most ne...
^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dequacy are the reasons of truancy while academic professional underachievement ...
^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the reasons of truancy while academic professional underachievement are the ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, in fact, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61194029851 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00674040436 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64552238806 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4659778204 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134650527507 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404885891447 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393857781024 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654163820609 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328934034197 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ualize what they pursue in their lives. Turning to possible effects, the most ne...
^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dequacy are the reasons of truancy while academic professional underachievement ...
^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the reasons of truancy while academic professional underachievement are the ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, in fact, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61194029851 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00674040436 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64552238806 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4659778204 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134650527507 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404885891447 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393857781024 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654163820609 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328934034197 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.