Nowadays, ordering food has gained popularity and received a great deal of public attention while some people support that consuming local food is beneficial to the environment and the economy, I believe that the merits of this way would outstrip the demerits.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of the consumption of local food. Firstly, local food is not variety. Because of the limit of gradients and secret recipes, a local has only some classic dishes and the locals have born and grown in there for a long time. Therefore, these do not trigger their curiously. Even, some locations are not likely to manufacture their foods since that restriction, such as mordent cities namely HCM, Ha Noi. So, the locals need to utilize foods from another place.
However, it is not negative that the benefits of this way are outweighed by the drawbacks. Initial, regarding the economy, eating regional food has contributed to the stable of the consumer market. This means that the locals consume their products for daily life themselves, assisting goods to trade and to make profits. Secondly, in term of the medicine and environment, the locals cultivate and feed directly to serve their demand. They, therefore, using insecticides and chemical fertilizers, are careful as they have born the weight of their health and the behind generations. As a result, this has a positive impact on addressing pollution.
In conclusion, ordering food is more and more common in modern life. Utilizing local food, though, is not without downsides about monotonous dishes. But it is not negative the upsides would justify on the point of environment, medicine, and economic view.
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows the water cycle, which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. 73
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 93
- The diagram below shows the water cycle, which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11355311355 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69493530046 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4826980418 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263026567337 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876293917957 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605869848411 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15791552295 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511208288268 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.