The given diagram illustrates how many people under 1000 people, who have smoked, are in Someland over four decades up to 2000.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clear evident that , there was a contraction in here, the quantity of smoker of male, which witnessed an upward trend, went down significantly while those of female had two clear stages with one of dramatical increase over a course of 25 years starting from 1960, and one of gradual decline in the 25 years later.
In 1960 registered 600 men in 1000 people both two sex by contract, this number was only approximate 100 women. Over 25 years, there was a commendable signal, the rate of smoking gentles witnessed a slight drop by 100. However, those of ladies saw a sharp climb with a threefold over the time frame.
The figure of smoking male continued to decline by half over the following 25-years period. Further, at the same time, the female seemed to have some change therefore, the people in this sex fell to its lowest level. In 2000, in per 1000 people, there were to reach 250 men and roughly 200 women using tobacco.
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.https://www.ielts-exam.net/im 89
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...from the graph, it is clear evident that , there was a contraction in here, the qu...
^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there were to reach 250 men and roughly 200 women using tobacco.
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and roughly 200 women using tobacco.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59693877551 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35981107068 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663265306122 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5135405555 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227967488895 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842460187517 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507719537022 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125316034323 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261777412875 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.