Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
The recent decades have seen enormous changes in the way people's lives are affected by the technology, particularly in performing household chores. While it is argued that technological advances in this field have brought some drawbacks, I believe that the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
It is evident that using various types of gadgets in order to do domestic jobs results in some negative impacts. On the one hand, all of this equipment rely on electricity consumption which is generated difficulty and costly. On the other hand, having been used wildly, they release a huge amount of heat and pollution into the atmosphere. For example, Freon used in most of the refrigerators said to be one of the main reason for Ozone Depletion phenomenon. At the same time, from the individual's perspective, having involved in different household chores, people used to be more active and then healthy. Nowadays, sedentary lifestyle is going to be more common among residents as a result of using machines expensively in the home.
Nevertheless, the effects of this new trend have not all been detrimental. Undoubtedly, most of the people approve this idea that the widespread use of modern appliances such as vacuum cleaner or dish washer just to name, leads to saving their time. People certainly prefer to allocate their free time into useful subjects like reading books or family gathering instead of doing unfinished daily routine activities. Moreover, unlike the human, not until these electrical devices break down, are they able to function accurately, without being influenced by environmental circumstances. In other words, if all household responsibilities were shouldered the human, perhaps some catastrophic consequences would emerge.
In conclusion, although there are some unavoidable downsides in using machines to do household jobs, it seems that they are more beneficial than being detrimental.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...phenomenon. At the same time, from the individuals perspective, having involved in differe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4584717608 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05373631151 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647840531561 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3520146496 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127305453372 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434369613955 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415937772505 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078200716002 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254477618296 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.