It is universally acknowledged that cutting-edge equipment can be able to do housework. I hold a firm conviction that the merits of using machines to deal with housework greatly outweigh drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is obvious that applying technologies in doing housework can trigger some adverse effects for human beings. First of all, via the prevalence of machines to cope with jobs at home, people may develop sedentary lifestyle. Indeed, convenient as equipmentis, people may become lazier when they depend on these machines, which leads to obesity. Secondly, a lot of households use the machine to do housework, which results in the increase in electric power demands. People have a tendency to use vacuum cleaners, refrigerators, washing machines, and so forth, in the long run, electronic power will be short in supply and more consequences for the environment can be attributed to modern and convenient machines.
On the other hand, in the technological age, I believe that people can not ignore the benefits of doing housework by machines. The first advantage is that in order to concentrate on work to make ends meet, people can use housing equipment to save their time. Both white-collar and blue-collar workers work under enormous pressures to improve their living standard, therefore, instead of spending more time on doing housework, they can enhance their work performance at workplaces. An additional benefit is that after working time, individuals may have more quality time for themselves or families. If people save their time for housework, they can have more leisure time with families or friends. To illustrate, women can go shopping as well as men can play sports.
In conclusion, despite the fact that doing housework by machines can cause some adverse impacts, I believe that the advantages of hi-tech gadgets outweigh these disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pe with jobs at home, people may develop sedentary lifestyle. Indeed, convenient ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29096989967 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96421085819 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571906354515 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5285091674 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17104145155 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626288641785 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413348077538 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969853443126 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401316266458 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.