Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by
tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done
to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that the number of global tourists comes to visit historical destinations as well as museums higher than local residents. While these problems stemming from many causes, it can be improved by attracting individuals of the host country through practical actions.
There are two main reasons why foreign tourists spend more love for museums and historical monuments than local ones. The first reason is museums are too familiar with its community. If authorities do not want to change museum appearance by a new way to stimulate residents' curiosity, their presidents can not see anything new to discover. Just like when they eat a dish every day, they will feel boring when they need to visit a whole old place without changes. Moreover, the ticket fee of rhapsodic sites is too expensive to residents, they can not pay for this. For example, in some rural areas, earning a living is very difficult so local people, absolutely, do not want to waste their money for this activity. Thus, they have never had a chance to visit historical museums.
Mentioning about the solutions, local authorities should put some effective measurements in place to deal with these issues. Firstly, museums must be invested more by authorities in order to change its appearance and exhibits. To be more specific, it needs to vary the way how museums are running. Secondly, historical places must be opened free for not only tourists but also local inhabitants to raise their awareness about their history.
To sum up, there are a variety of reasons for this tendency. However, welcoming more visitors to museums and historical sites is the responsibility of local authorities.
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree of disagree? 84
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001. 11
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 82
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 82
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
It is true that the number of global tourists comes to visit historical destinations ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07636363636 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74251739336 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5866357113 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366542713454 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110390585111 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571895465055 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21718432275 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179968038927 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.