Some exhibition in the museums nowadays asks their visitors to pay for the entrance, but there are also many museums that do not charge anything. It arises a query that which woud be better, paying for tickets or going for free?
Enjoying without any fee would definitely be beneficial for the majority who witnesses the art work for entertainment and experience only. It means most people coming to those museums tend to have a simple goal that they also want to absorb the civilization value of the world like other people. If they go to some precious places containing a huge devotation left by many generations but lose nothing, they will be gleeful to visit without hesitation.
On the other hand, when we look at the terms of real displays for real visitors, it would be another story. It is carefully considered that there are many guests having more complex purposes to be charged at museums. Some of them might be artists who are willing to see directly by their eyes and analyse the displays in delication and elaboration. Furthermore, because this is the place where generates all of skillful and artistic work with the authors around the globe and in many ages, it is worth to have genuine audience who are pleased to pay and watch them with entire honour and respect.
In conclusion, although the number of guests to charging museums is in decline compared to free museums, I assure that the humanity value these museums bring to authors and audience would outweigh the deficit of visitor limit.
- 2 A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for y 95
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- In the past most families ate together in the evening and the food was almost always cooked at home Nowadays however many families rarely eat together every day and often the food is bought outside the house or supplied by catering What are the reaso 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82307692308 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5212821947 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607692307692 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.012651428 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263016268878 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103467812675 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860484752552 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175046883837 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895394505287 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.