Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. what are your opinions on this?
WHO (World Health Organisation) has recently presented statistics on the number of people who died due to both active and passive smoking in Europe; according to the data, this figure has significantly decreased comparing to the results conducted two decades ago. This dramatic change has been reached by such strict law as banning smoking in work and public places. Nevertheless, the rule has been protested in many European cities, mostly by smokers, as they believe the law infringes freedom.
Cigarette fume can be harmful to a smoker as well as to people nearby the smoker. Moreover, WHO asserts that passive smokers suffer more than their active counterparts. Smoking causes various diseases: cardiovascular, neurological and lung cancer. As a result, many non-smoker Europeans had involuntarily suffered from the diseases until the law took effect, which resulting in a plenty of companies losing income due to the fact that the employees actively took sick leaves. In addition, European countries could have put young generation into jeopardy since public places are usually occupied by children. I, for instance, used to avoid smokers while I had a walk in the community park at the center of Munich, which unfortunately was smokers' favorite spot, not to inhale fume; however, now I can take a walk without worrying fume.
The governments have not absolutely prohibited smoking in the cities; there are still smoking zones, where anyone can freely smoke, away from both work and public places. Thus, it is unfair to protest the law for restricting smokers' freedom.
Europe is one of the first countries initiated smoking-free areas. The initiation is essential and strategic, thus, it has to be carried out; otherwise, it is restricting freedom of non-smokers for a healthy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-17 | Nugman | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-04 | Stephanie Kaushal | 93 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment. 73
- “Prevention is better that curve.” Out of a country’s budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...fair to protest the law for restricting smokers freedom. Europe is one of the first ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27972027972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84311963486 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5321285725 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174408762273 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063330734118 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649288268642 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122533415644 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718777040142 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.