Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think that they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Give reasons and include relevant examples.
Architectural influence has always played a vital role in the construction. A lion’s share of society believe that old buildings should be demolished and replaced with new, however, the rest go averse it. This essay will cast light on why both buildings plays significant role in any country.
To begin with, there are ample benefits why old buildings should not be knocked down. The predominant benefit is to connect present and past life. To be more precise, old building’s construction is basically related to history and it will succor for fetching more about India’s struggle for independence and value of freedom. For instance, the Gandhi Ashram at Ahmedabad played a pivotal role in our freedom struggle against the British. Another advantage is, tourists visit these old buildings and spend some amount of wealth on that places which help not only for government but also for native people because they provide jobs and extra income for aboriginal people.
On the contrary, in spite of having some merits regarding old constructions, it has some benefits also when it replaced with new buildings. Initially, new buildings are cheaper, beneficial and added with modern technology instead of preserving the old ones. In addition, modern buildings have made the city become fascinating and attractive. As a result, they become one of the tourist’sdestination places because today’s generation easily get boring when they visit old buildings. Eiffel Tower in Paris where thousands of people have visited these modern buildings which is a good example.
To recapitulate, it is rightly said that “old is gold.” Even though new buildings may be cheaper and advanced, old buildings should not be demolished due to enhancing of knowledge, freedom fighter’s struggle and many more.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47183098592 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14779082626 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.762943387 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351936108025 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118380914381 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964378329082 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222419756576 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417872116692 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.