Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
Many governments impose some sorts of law in order to preserve dated constructions which plays a crucial role with respect to a country’s history. However, many individuals suppose they should be demolished to make way for new ones. From my perspective, I believe it is essential to restore heritages and progress can not be stopped by history
Maintaining old buildings is of great importance for every nation because of these core reasons. Firstly, since these buildings were built in considerable earlier spans so they can be considered as concrete evidence for every ups and downs of a nation. Therefore, they are tremendously valuable in terms of culture, inspiration and beliefs. Secondly, due to their unique designs, they can attract a host of tourists, which can increase local people’s income and contribute many positive effects to a nation’s economy
Although many people considered these buildings as obsolete and even hinder the progress of their countries, in fact there are no sorts of heritages can do that. Restoring old buildings can also include modernization, by technical method, many experts can not only keep the original characters of a construction but also make them more captivating. Also, the prominent purpose of these places is education which can provide people with deeper insights into historical events or figures in the most genuine way and boost their patriotism, thus, they can be motivated and acknowledged to make big contributions to their countries in the future
To conclude, old buildings which are indispensable parts of every nation are suggested to be knocked down and replaced by modern buildings. Nevertheless, I suppose that these constructions possess not only spiritual but also economical assets, and in no circumstances can these locations stand in the way of a progress
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | honganhb2409759 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, i suppose, in fact, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33103448276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05878979434 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593103448276 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.45696649 49.4020404114 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.777777778 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7777777778 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300272845199 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117993413033 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620515549799 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184358813866 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376084982795 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.