Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons/Solutions to change negative attitudes?
Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons/Solutions to change negative attitudes?
It is widely argued that global tourism has an adverse impact on the destination countries so the issue should be considered carefully. Some causes for this problem can be identified and I believe that solutions must be applied to resolve some of the serious consequences which have arisen.
Two primary reasons that are associated with the negative impact of international tourism are closely related to the local residence’s environment and tradition. From the natural perspective, a large number of visitors from other countries are the cause of polluted environment. It is true that tourists are often under the awareness of disposing waste in the available trash bins and clearing litter over places that they have been to. Many famous beaches in Vietnam such as Mui Ne, Nha Trang, or Vung Tau have been ruined by this lack of respect for the communal environment. International tourism is also considered as a bad thing for its undesirable influence on the local traditional values and customs. In Vietnam, it is very easy to find foreign tourists with provocative behavior and fashions, which would in turn lead to the imitation of regional young dwellers.
Various solutions should be taken into account in order to address the concerns of the local people. First, for impeding the environmental harmful impact, government should force strict regulations regarding tourists’ insensitiveness on throwing garbage. Publicly posting friendly and funny signs such as “Welcome to the cleanest beach in Vietnam” or “Hi, you’ve just visit the BLUE destination!” also gives ways to avoiding visitors’ ignorance toward protecting the environment and urge them to respect the local culture and custom. Regional residents’ minds toward international tourism should also be changed in favor of the benefits it brings about so that the more foreign visitors come, the more job opportunities it create and the higher the nation revenue is.
In conclusion, it seems to us that although global tourism results in some detrimental development, it is possible to call for resolutions from national bodies and local community.
- A work colleague has applied for a new job, and she has asked you to write a reference letter to the new employer.Write a letter to the employer to recommend you colleague.In your letter:-State your reason for writing and say how you know the applicant-De 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons/Solutions to change negative attitudes? 89
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...at solutions must be applied to resolve some of the serious consequences which have arisen....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...radition. From the natural perspective, a large number of visitors from other countries are the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 764, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...ors come, the more job opportunities it create and the higher the nation revenue is. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51404494382 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21274029875 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592696629213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3984018046 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.866666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299952287739 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125974028475 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189394905867 0.0667982634062 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270264997569 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366502633887 0.056905535591 644% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.