Many people believe that teachers can influence the intellectual and social development of children, more that parents do. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
There is an opinion asserting that the prominent role of teachers is highlighted when it comes to comparing with the parenting role. These interpretations can provide us with insights into the important role of teachers in improving intellectual capacity as well as social skills. I completely agree with the given assertion on the basis of a multitude of compelling reasons.
To begin with, the main reason is that social skills and intellectual path have been generally formed during the formative years that teachers are the cornerstone of flourishing these developments. To put it differently, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of tutors' personal life, they spend a great deal of their time at school to educate children. Not only to who teachers learn the pupils the alphabet and the numeral, but also improve the students' social skills throughout creating interaction and competition in a friendly atmosphere within peer classmates. This in turn brings them a fortune to boost their social communication and rational thinking as a consequence of inclining to be a wise and sociable person.
Having said that, no one can deny that the teachers' role is placed a premium on other influential roles, while parenting role could be accounted for a stimulus-responsive factor in the respect of co-operation. Simply put, as a dire consequence of facing demanding situations in the parents' lifestyle, have no ample time to cherish their offsprings. That means, the more parents spend time for their children, the better intellectual capacity, nurturing and tending to socialize are bound to appear. A good illustration of this completing style of parents is that they could receive the weakness and deficit of their kids by assisting teachers and end up solving their problems in oriented-cooperation. Therefore, such children are likely associated with an admirable situation making them full-fledged persons.
To conclude, it is my firm conviction that teachers play a vital role in boosting children's capability from both perspectives of social and personal skills. That is mainly because they spend more time with children compared with their own parents, in particular, in some sensitive years.
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions in this? 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 67
- Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing Why do you think it is happening How can this problem be solved 87
- In many countries traditional food is being replaced by international fast food. This has negative effects on both families and societies. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ing said that, no one can deny that the teachers role is placed a premium on other influ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...e of facing demanding situations in the parents lifestyle, have no ample time to cheris...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, in particular, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43063583815 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19077762409 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4657063447 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.214285714 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2081390774 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747678392353 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329245705193 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133356552698 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215116188699 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.