In the past people used to mend and repair itmes that were broken. It was commonplace to resew worn out clothes or fix old shoes, by replacing sole and laces. Due to the shortage of clothings or due to difficult financial situations, people had to struggle to find ways to protect them from the winter or have functioning farming tools.
These days things have changed for the better: industrialization has taken place in most of the countries in the world and factories are now able to produce items in such a speed and quantity as it has never been seen before. The increase of productivity has mostly positive aspects on our day to day life. Shortage of food or any sort of supplies are today unusual and almost only a far memory of the past. Supermarkets, grocery stores, clothing stores are actually fool of items so that people have the possibility to choose what they most desire to pick up.
This rather bright aspect of industrialization should not, however, make us blind to the fact there are some drawbacks we should highlight. First of all, in order to keep the engine on, people are somwhow encouraged to buy rather than to repair. If consumers stop purchising brand new items and switch to repair them, many companies will have to face financial hardhips and massive redundancies. Secondly, some items can be crappy assembled, so that they do not just function properly after the warranty period has expired. In this case, repair is not granted by the producer and consumers are forced t buy a new item. Thirdly, there is world made of advertising, magazines, reports and reviews that revolves around the market. To satisfy the expectations of those subjects, companies produce always more sophisitcated items, like more powerful samrtphones, brighter TVs or lighter notebooks, which people do not really need .
In the race for the most modern item, people end up by spending unnecessarily amount of money that could be better invested. To make a tangible example, some regard a two-year-old computer as junk that has to be scrapped. In truth, old computers can function as good as new models and the average user would not notice any difference. Furthermore, some parts can be easily replaced and reliable operating systems can be installed for free. In this case, as we can see, there would be no need to throw away a functioning computer to buy another one. Te throw-away society only damages the environment, sharpens pollution and ensue an unnecessary rush of consumerism.
- Computer games are very popular in all ages and nationalities Parents think it has little educational value and more harmful effects What is your opinion about it 70
- Some people think governments should spend less money on arts and invest more in education How far do you agree or disagree with this opinion 80
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and examples 80
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'produce'.
Suggestion: always produce
...pectations of those subjects, companies produce always more sophisitcated items, like more pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 925, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tebooks, which people do not really need . In the race for the most modern ite...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91943127962 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80314656776 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8940548156 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212432279549 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490732175185 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408577542896 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100975450135 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049385699468 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.