Whetther globalisation has brought advantages or represents a negative process is still up for debate. Many people claim that that harful threaths like pollution and climate change have to be linked to globalization and multinational companies. If industries play surely a pivotal role in interfering with the atmosphere, the question whether the whole process of globalization should be regarded as the only responsible of natural calamities, remains open.
In order to develop their economy and guarantee their citizens high standards of living, governments have allocated enormous resources to subsidize industries. As a result level of carion-dioxide have been soaring during the last decades causing or being critical to worsening the greenhouse effect. Meanwhile large companies have become even bigger, merging together and giving birth to multinational companies, which operate in overseas countries and have outbranches all over the world. Some people have a negative attitude towards them, accusing of destroying the enviroment.
Some companies like those involved in gaining raw commodities such as petrol, gold or rare earth metals are responsible for some of the most detrimental natural disaster. Oil spills, for example, happen sometimes, ensuing detrimental effect on the coastal environment and endangering the marine ecosystem. It is hard to say and accept but this sometimes the price we have to pay if we want to conserve the current standard of living. Those accidents occured in the past too. Big difference now, people have developed a profound interest in environmental issues urging companies to reduce their carbon footprint.
On the other hand, the silver lining of multinational companies is that they are without any doubt a powerful source of development and are the largest employers in the world. Many of them like Microsoft have changed the way we live, communicate and work, by launching revolutionary operating systems and making computers affordable for almost everyone. Others, like General Electric produce high-end medical machines and develop cutting-edge drugs and technologies to tackle letal deseases. Furthermore multinational companies help to improve the economic condition of underdeveloped countries by building facilities and eventually hiring local work force.
In conclusion, if ot is true that the spread of globalisation and the rise of multinational companies play a part in the climate change, the benefits brought by these industries outweigh to me the downsides.
- With the advent of the internet increasing number of people are shopping online what issues arise from this and how can they be tackled 89
- Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on the society is negative while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... still up for debate. Many people claim that that harful threaths like pollution and cli...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y people claim that that harful threaths like pollution and climate change have t...
^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...role in interfering with the atmosphere, the question whether the whole process o...
^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...le in interfering with the atmosphere, the question whether the whole process of globalization shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...cal to worsening the greenhouse effect. Meanwhile large companies have become even bigger...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'happen'.
Suggestion: sometimes happen
...ural disaster. Oil spills, for example, happen sometimes, ensuing detrimental effect on the coas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... technologies to tackle letal deseases. Furthermore multinational companies help to improve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68073878628 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1209047351 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630606860158 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0907735495 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.647058824 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180802305614 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528223856367 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345542160951 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924794893056 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194913751977 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.