Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles

There is no doubt that the utilization of private automobiles on roads for traveling has been increased. More automobiles on roads will increase the pollution in the environment, which will have severe effects on the ecosystem. However, there are methods to sustain this effect. In this essay, I will discuss why people are dependent on vehicles in means of transports and techniques to reduce the effect of those wheelers.

Cars and motorcycles are primary means of transport, an individual feels convenient and comfortable in their private four-wheelers and two-wheelers. Though, overconsumption of these vehicles increases pollution in the environment. Additionally, depletion of non-renewable resources such as petroleum, which has other uses for survival on Earth. Moreover, nowadays, the utilization of automobiles has been increased, which has affected the quality of oxygen in the atmosphere for breathing. Therefore, lesser exhaustion of vehicles will sustain a healthier environment and ecosystem.

There are two methods to reduce the usage of cars and motorbikes on roads which has positive sides for mankind. Firstly, the government should improve the public transport facilities for citizens who are daily traveling to their work. Subsequently, the congestion of traffic jams will not be occurring on roads. Moreover, individuals should use buses and metros while going to their work. In this way, they will have a small brisk walk for communicating to metro stations and bus stops which will make their body physically fit and healthy. As a result, this adaption will result improve today’s lifestyle and reduce the severe effects of pollution.

In conclusion, I firmly concur that low usage of automobiles on roads will have some merits for people living in the modern world.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...private four-wheelers and two-wheelers. Though, overconsumption of these vehicles incr...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50541516245 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06302744552 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7616824091 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192709122504 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614570938305 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362228764358 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109036025004 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404853613118 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.