Over the years, physical exploration on the moon has provided humans a wealth of knowledge which in turn aided many areas of science and technology. Although, some people think that there have been modest improvements to human’s life out of that expensive space travel. Nonetheless, I fully disagree with the latter opinion as I believe that the manned exploration of space have produced tremendous technological breakthroughs that have been improve the quality of life back in this planet.
One of the clearest beneficial contribution of space exploration is the technological innovation of airplane’s manual flight controls. In the past, pilots used to applied forces when controlling an aircraft. But because of the space program, they were able to build computer guidance system called digital fly-by-wire control system that will convert flyer’s inputs into electrical signals and transmit to aircraft’s computer control system. Another benefits from space travel is the increased of technological capability, the contribution of American engineers caused a dramatic shift in electronics and computing systems such as computer and other communication devices. Humanity greatly benefited from this endeavor, particularly in the field of telecommunication.
On the flip side, the space exploration comes with huge costs and some says that the program has made minimal impact to human’s life. Others even argued that the money spent on the exploration can be put to better use in other worthy activities on the ground such as feeding the growing number of destitute in poor countries. However, the economic benefits from space program far exceed the total investment. The space activities created a multiple advances in areas of science and technology that further improve the business activities today. The space programs squeezed the creative minds of engineers and computer scientists that fuel the discovery of computer technology to what it is today.
In conclusion, since the last human being left the moon several years ago, the space programs had bring out numerous societal benefits which enhance the quality of life to billions of people. I think that the realisation of having a human to walk on the lunar surface has spurred innovations in so many industries resulted in significant positive impact to the global economy.
- Television dominates the free time of too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others Do you agree or disagree 78
- In the future it may be necessary for us to live on other planets For this reason some people believe that we should spend money now to research other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Last month you travelled to another city You told a friend who lives in the city that you would meet them but you did not Write a letter to this friend In your letter apologise for not meeting him her explain why you did not contact him her earlier sugges 61
- You had a good meal in a local restaurant with your family Write a letter to the newspaper to tell them about it describe the meal you had and why you think the restaurant is worth visiting 78
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him Another friend of yours is willing to go Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you cannot go anymore say who can go instead of you say why this person i 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...hnological breakthroughs that have been improve the quality of life back in this planet...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the quality of life back in this planet One of the clearest beneficial contribut...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ularly in the field of telecommunication On the flip side the space exploration c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng number of destitute in poor countries However the economic benefits from space...
^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... computer technology to what it is today In conclusion since the last human being...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...everal years ago the space programs had bring out numerous societal benefits which en...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...everal years ago the space programs had bring out numerous societal benefits which en...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36914600551 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85315409306 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 363.0 20.2975951904 1788% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1949.0 106.682146367 1827% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 363.0 20.7667163134 1748% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 66.0 7.06120827912 935% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0475869364529 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475869364529 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335462612333 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209906229323 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 185.4 13.0946893788 1416% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -305.43 50.2224549098 -608% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 146.0 11.3001002004 1292% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.35 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.38 8.58950901804 307% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 147.2 10.1190380762 1455% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.7795591182 575% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.